Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8694015
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Ramirez
No. 8694015 · Decided April 10, 2015
No. 8694015·Ninth Circuit · 2015·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
April 10, 2015
Citation
No. 8694015
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Alfredo Cesar Ramirez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his jury-trial conviction and 63-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Ramirez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Ramirez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Alfredo Cesar Ramirez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his jury-trial conviction and 63-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Alfredo Cesar Ramirez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his jury-trial conviction and 63-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
021396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Ramirez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.
03We have provided Ramirez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief.
04No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Alfredo Cesar Ramirez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his jury-trial conviction and 63-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Ramirez in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 10, 2015.
Use the citation No. 8694015 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.