Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8626745
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Ramirez
No. 8626745 · Decided December 12, 2006
No. 8626745·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 12, 2006
Citation
No. 8626745
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Eduardo Ramirez appeals from the 48-month sentence imposed after his guilty-plea conviction to use of a communication facility, in violation U.S.C. § 843(b). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. *716 Ramirez contends that the district court imposed an unreasonable sentence because, inter alia, he played a minor role in the conspiracy and cooperated with the government. We disagree. Because the record reveals that during the sentencing hearing, the court took into account these considerations, and balanced them against other relevant factors, including the seriousness of the offense and the need to avoid unwarranted sentencing disparities, the 48-month sentence was reasonable. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a); United States v. Plouffe, 445 F.3d 1126, 1131 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 2314 , 164 L.Ed.2d 832 (2006). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Eduardo Ramirez appeals from the 48-month sentence imposed after his guilty-plea conviction to use of a communication facility, in violation U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Eduardo Ramirez appeals from the 48-month sentence imposed after his guilty-plea conviction to use of a communication facility, in violation U.S.C.
02*716 Ramirez contends that the district court imposed an unreasonable sentence because, inter alia, he played a minor role in the conspiracy and cooperated with the government.
03Because the record reveals that during the sentencing hearing, the court took into account these considerations, and balanced them against other relevant factors, including the seriousness of the offense and the need to avoid unwarranted se
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Eduardo Ramirez appeals from the 48-month sentence imposed after his guilty-plea conviction to use of a communication facility, in violation U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Ramirez in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 12, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8626745 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.