Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8625265
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Ramirez
No. 8625265 · Decided October 18, 2006
No. 8625265·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
October 18, 2006
Citation
No. 8625265
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Louis Ramirez, III, appeals from the restitution order imposed following his conviction for mail and wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 , 1341, 1343 and 2326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. Ramirez contends that the district court violated his Sixth Amendment rights by ordering restitution in an amount that exceeded what was supported by the jury’s verdict. This contention is foreclosed by United States v. Bussell, 414 F.3d 1048, 1060 (9th Cir.2005) (restitution orders are unaffected by the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 , 125 S.Ct. 738 , 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005)). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Louis Ramirez, III, appeals from the restitution order imposed following his conviction for mail and wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Louis Ramirez, III, appeals from the restitution order imposed following his conviction for mail and wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
02Ramirez contends that the district court violated his Sixth Amendment rights by ordering restitution in an amount that exceeded what was supported by the jury’s verdict.
03Bussell, 414 F.3d 1048, 1060 (9th Cir.2005) (restitution orders are unaffected by the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v.
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Louis Ramirez, III, appeals from the restitution order imposed following his conviction for mail and wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Ramirez in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on October 18, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8625265 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.