Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8625946
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Pulido
No. 8625946 · Decided November 14, 2006
No. 8625946·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
November 14, 2006
Citation
No. 8625946
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Marco Pulido appeals from the 108-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to posses with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 , and possession with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. Pulido contends that the district court erred by failing to sentence him to the low end of the sentencing range because the government was responsible for the amount of cocaine involved. We reject this contention because Pulido has failed to show that he lacked the intent and capability to provide the amount of drugs involved. See United States v. Naranjo, 52 F.3d 245, 250 n. 13 (9th Cir.1995). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Marco Pulido appeals from the 108-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to posses with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Marco Pulido appeals from the 108-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to posses with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
02§ 846 , and possession with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
03Pulido contends that the district court erred by failing to sentence him to the low end of the sentencing range because the government was responsible for the amount of cocaine involved.
04We reject this contention because Pulido has failed to show that he lacked the intent and capability to provide the amount of drugs involved.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Marco Pulido appeals from the 108-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to posses with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Pulido in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on November 14, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8625946 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.