Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8700784
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Pruett
No. 8700784 · Decided January 9, 2018
No. 8700784·Ninth Circuit · 2018·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
January 9, 2018
Citation
No. 8700784
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
ORDER The separate concurrence to the memorandum disposition filed November 30, 2017, is amended as follows: On page 2, line 17 of the concurrence, change “In sum, even if we assume” to “Even if we assume”; on page 3, at the end of line 5 of the concurrence, add the citation: “Beckles v. United States, — U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 886, 897-98 , 197 L.Ed.2d 145 (Ginsburg, J., concurring).” With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny Appellant’s petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and' no judge of the court has requested a vote on it. , Appellant’s petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc is DENIED. No further petitions for panel rehearing or for rehearing en banc may be filed.
Plain English Summary
ORDER The separate concurrence to the memorandum disposition filed November 30, 2017, is amended as follows: On page 2, line 17 of the concurrence, change “In sum, even if we assume” to “Even if we assume”; on page 3, at the end of line 5 o
Key Points
01ORDER The separate concurrence to the memorandum disposition filed November 30, 2017, is amended as follows: On page 2, line 17 of the concurrence, change “In sum, even if we assume” to “Even if we assume”; on page 3, at the end of line 5 o
02886, 897-98 , 197 L.Ed.2d 145 (Ginsburg, J., concurring).” With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny Appellant’s petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc.
03The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and' no judge of the court has requested a vote on it.
04, Appellant’s petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc is DENIED.
Frequently Asked Questions
ORDER The separate concurrence to the memorandum disposition filed November 30, 2017, is amended as follows: On page 2, line 17 of the concurrence, change “In sum, even if we assume” to “Even if we assume”; on page 3, at the end of line 5 o
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Pruett in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on January 9, 2018.
Use the citation No. 8700784 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.