Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10617804
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Prior
No. 10617804 · Decided June 26, 2025
No. 10617804·Ninth Circuit · 2025·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
June 26, 2025
Citation
No. 10617804
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 26 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-7245
D.C. No.
Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:23-cr-00135-DCN-1
v.
MEMORANDUM*
TRACY LYNN PRIOR,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Idaho
David C. Nye, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 18, 2025**
Before: CANBY, S.R. THOMAS, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.
Tracy Lynn Prior appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges
the restitution payment schedule set by the court following her guilty-plea
conviction for four counts of wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Prior was ordered to pay restitution in the amount of $416,930.96, with
monthly payments upon her release of at least $1,500. Prior contends this schedule
will leave her destitute because $1,500 represents 74% of her monthly income
from social security disability payments, which may not resume after her
incarceration. We review the district court’s restitution schedule for abuse of
discretion. See United States v. Inouye, 821 F.3d 1152, 1155 (9th Cir. 2016).
The district court did not abuse its discretion. It considered the 18 U.S.C.
§ 3664(f)(2) factors and the uncontested facts in the presentence report. It then
reasonably determined that Prior’s community assets—when considered along
with her liabilities—were sufficient to support the monthly payments. Because the
record supports this determination, we affirm. See Inouye, 821 F.3d at 1157
(district court abuses its discretion in setting restitution payment schedule only if
its order is “illogical, implausible, or without support from the record”).
AFFIRMED.
2 24-7245
Plain English Summary
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 26 2025 MOLLY C.
Key Points
01NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 26 2025 MOLLY C.
02COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No.
03Nye, District Judge, Presiding Submitted June 18, 2025** Before: CANBY, S.R.
04Tracy Lynn Prior appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the restitution payment schedule set by the court following her guilty-plea conviction for four counts of wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C.
Frequently Asked Questions
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 26 2025 MOLLY C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Prior in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on June 26, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10617804 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.