Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8641650
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Portillo
No. 8641650 · Decided June 14, 2007
No. 8641650·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
June 14, 2007
Citation
No. 8641650
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Jesus Tomas Ortiz Portillo appeals from the 57-month sentence imposed following remand under United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. Portillo’s challenges to the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (b) and the continuing validity of Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 , 118 S.Ct. 1219 , 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), are foreclosed. See United States v. Beng-Salazar, 452 F.3d 1088, 1097 (9th Cir.2006). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Jesus Tomas Ortiz Portillo appeals from the 57-month sentence imposed following remand under United States v.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Jesus Tomas Ortiz Portillo appeals from the 57-month sentence imposed following remand under United States v.
02§ 1326 (b) and the continuing validity of Almendarez-Torres v.
03This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir.
04
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Jesus Tomas Ortiz Portillo appeals from the 57-month sentence imposed following remand under United States v.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Portillo in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on June 14, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8641650 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.