Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8627823
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Pineda-Arreguin
No. 8627823 · Decided January 12, 2007
No. 8627823·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
January 12, 2007
Citation
No. 8627823
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Nicandro Pineda-Arreguin appeals from his 120-month sentence imposed following a guilty plea to possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. Pineda-Arreguin contends that the district court improperly denied him a “safety valve” sentence reduction pursuant to United States Sentencing Guidelines section 5C1.2. Upon review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not clearly err in determining that Pineda-Arreguin failed to meet his burden of showing that he had provided truthful and complete information about his offense. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (f); United States v. Ajugwo, 82 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir.1996). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Nicandro Pineda-Arreguin appeals from his 120-month sentence imposed following a guilty plea to possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Nicandro Pineda-Arreguin appeals from his 120-month sentence imposed following a guilty plea to possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
02Pineda-Arreguin contends that the district court improperly denied him a “safety valve” sentence reduction pursuant to United States Sentencing Guidelines section 5C1.2.
03Upon review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not clearly err in determining that Pineda-Arreguin failed to meet his burden of showing that he had provided truthful and complete information about his offense.
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Nicandro Pineda-Arreguin appeals from his 120-month sentence imposed following a guilty plea to possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Pineda-Arreguin in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on January 12, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8627823 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.