Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8646610
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Pena-Hernandez
No. 8646610 · Decided December 28, 2007
No. 8646610·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 28, 2007
Citation
No. 8646610
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Francisco Pena-Hernandez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 87-month sentence for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Pena-Hernandez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Because Pena-Hernandez knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal and was sentenced within the terms of the plea agreement, we enforce the waiver and dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, appellant’s pro se motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED, and this appeal is DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Francisco Pena-Hernandez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 87-month sentence for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Francisco Pena-Hernandez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 87-month sentence for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
021396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Pena-Hernandez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.
03We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief.
04No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Francisco Pena-Hernandez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 87-month sentence for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Pena-Hernandez in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 28, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8646610 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.