Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8645392
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Navidad-Camacho
No. 8645392 · Decided November 26, 2007
No. 8645392·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
November 26, 2007
Citation
No. 8645392
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Jose Octavio Navidad-Camacho appeals from the 57-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a) and enhanced by 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (b)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. Navidad-Camacho contends that the district court erred by failing to individualize his sentence according to the statutory factors and by focusing to an inordinate degree on the advisory Sentencing Guidelines. This contention is not supported by the record. Navidad-Camacho also contends that his sentence is unreasonable because it is greater than necessary under 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a). We conclude that Navidad-Camacho’s sentence is not unreasonable. See United States v. Plouffe, 445 F.3d 1126, 1131 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 547 U.S. 1158 , 126 S.Ct. 2314 , 164 L.Ed.2d 832 (2006). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Jose Octavio Navidad-Camacho appeals from the 57-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Jose Octavio Navidad-Camacho appeals from the 57-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C.
02Navidad-Camacho contends that the district court erred by failing to individualize his sentence according to the statutory factors and by focusing to an inordinate degree on the advisory Sentencing Guidelines.
03Navidad-Camacho also contends that his sentence is unreasonable because it is greater than necessary under 18 U.S.C.
04We conclude that Navidad-Camacho’s sentence is not unreasonable.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Jose Octavio Navidad-Camacho appeals from the 57-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Navidad-Camacho in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on November 26, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8645392 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.