Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8646261
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Navarro
No. 8646261 · Decided December 13, 2007
No. 8646261·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 13, 2007
Citation
No. 8646261
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Francisco Navarro appeals the district court’s decision that he was not safety- *925 valve eligible. Navarro did not waive his ability to appeal safety-valve eligibility in his plea agreement because that appellate waiver was contingent on Navarro’s safety-valve eligibility. We review a district court’s interpretation of the Sentencing Guidelines de novo and its application of the Sentencing Guidelines to the facts for abuse of discretion. United States v. Kimbrew, 406 F.3d 1149, 1151 (9th Cir.2005). The district court improperly awarded Navarro three criminal history points. A sentence for a misdemeanor listed under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(c)(1) counts as a criminal justice sentence only if the term of probation actually imposed is more than one year. See U.S. v. Gonzales, 506 F.3d 940 (9th Cir.2007) (en banc). At the time of his arrest, Navarro was serving a three year probation sentence for driving without a license imposed by the state court. However, at the time of the sentencing the state court had terminated the sentence nunc pro tunc to the day before he was arrested. As a result of the nunc pro tunc order, Navarro received only six-month probation for driving without a license. A six month probation sentence for driving without a license is not a criminal justice sentence. See U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(c)(l)(A). Therefore, Navarro never served a countable criminal justice sentence and hence could not commit the instant offense under a criminal justice sentence. See U.S.S.G. § 4Al.l(d). As such, Navarro should have been awarded zero criminal history points and found safety-valve eligible. Therefore, we VACATE Navarro’s sentence and REMAND to the district court for resentencing. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I respectfully dissent because, as I see it, Navarro “committed the instant offense while under [a] criminal justice sentence” of probation, 1 regardless of the fact that the state court later tinkered with that sentence. That precludes safety valve relief. . USSG § 4Al.l(d); see also USSG § 4A1.2(c)(l).
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Francisco Navarro appeals the district court’s decision that he was not safety- *925 valve eligible.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Francisco Navarro appeals the district court’s decision that he was not safety- *925 valve eligible.
02Navarro did not waive his ability to appeal safety-valve eligibility in his plea agreement because that appellate waiver was contingent on Navarro’s safety-valve eligibility.
03We review a district court’s interpretation of the Sentencing Guidelines de novo and its application of the Sentencing Guidelines to the facts for abuse of discretion.
04The district court improperly awarded Navarro three criminal history points.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Francisco Navarro appeals the district court’s decision that he was not safety- *925 valve eligible.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Navarro in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 13, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8646261 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.