Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8627827
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Murillo
No. 8627827 · Decided January 12, 2007
No. 8627827·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
January 12, 2007
Citation
No. 8627827
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Jesus Murillo, Jr. appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 110-month sentence imposed for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922 (g)(1) & 924(a)(2), and possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) & (b)(1)(C). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Murillo’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Because our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82-83 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), indicates that Murillo knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal and was sentenced within the terms of the plea agreement, we enforce the waiver and dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000) (stating that an appeal waiver is valid when it is entered knowingly and voluntarily). Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. The appeal is DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 110-month sentence imposed for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
Key Points
01appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 110-month sentence imposed for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
02§§ 922 (g)(1) & 924(a)(2), and possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
031396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Murillo’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.
04No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Frequently Asked Questions
appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 110-month sentence imposed for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Murillo in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on January 12, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8627827 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.