FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 3004877
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. Miguel Rivera-Lezama

No. 3004877 · Decided September 25, 2015
No. 3004877 · Ninth Circuit · 2015 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
September 25, 2015
Citation
No. 3004877
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION SEP 25 2015 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 14-10550 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:13-cr-01598-CKJ v. MEMORANDUM* MIGUEL RIVERA-LEZAMA, a.k.a. Alvaro Rivera Melchor, a.k.a. Miguel Alvaro Rivera-Lezama, a.k.a. Miguel Alvaro Rivera-Lizama, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding Submitted September 21, 2015** Before: REINHARDT, LEAVY, and BERZON, Circuit Judges. Miguel Rivera-Lezama appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 21-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S. 738 (1967), Rivera-Lezama’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Rivera-Lezama the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Rivera-Lezama waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss the appeal. See id. at 988. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. DISMISSED. 2 14-10550
Plain English Summary
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION SEP 25 2015 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION SEP 25 2015 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Miguel Rivera-Lezama in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 25, 2015.
Use the citation No. 3004877 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →