United States v. Meza-Moras

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 25 2024 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-2436 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 4:21-cr-01400-JAS-JR-1 v. MEMORANDUM* ELIDIO MEZA-MORAS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James A. Soto, District Judge, Presiding Submitted September 17, 2024 ** Before: WARDLAW, BADE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges. Elidio Meza-Moras appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the revocation of supervised release and eight-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Meza- Moras’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Meza-Moras the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. AFFIRMED. 2 24-2436