Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8629417
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Merida-Simota
No. 8629417 · Decided March 16, 2007
No. 8629417·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
March 16, 2007
Citation
No. 8629417
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Upon review of the record and appellant’s opening brief, appellee’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because appellant raised no substantial issue as to the reasonableness of his sentence, or the denial of downward departure for cultural assimilation, that requires further argument. See United States v. Cantrell, 433 F.3d 1269, 1278-79 (9th Cir. 2006) (after Booker, the court reviews appellant’s sentence for reasonableness and reviews the district court’s application of the Sentencing Guidelines for abuse of discretion); United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment and sentence. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Upon review of the record and appellant’s opening brief, appellee’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because appellant raised no substantial issue as to the reasonableness of his sentence, or the denial of d
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Upon review of the record and appellant’s opening brief, appellee’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because appellant raised no substantial issue as to the reasonableness of his sentence, or the denial of d
022006) (after Booker, the court reviews appellant’s sentence for reasonableness and reviews the district court’s application of the Sentencing Guidelines for abuse of discretion); United States v.
03Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment and sentence.
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Upon review of the record and appellant’s opening brief, appellee’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because appellant raised no substantial issue as to the reasonableness of his sentence, or the denial of d
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Merida-Simota in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 16, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8629417 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.