Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8644273
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Mendez-Mendez
No. 8644273 · Decided October 1, 2007
No. 8644273·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
October 1, 2007
Citation
No. 8644273
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Guillermo Mendez-Mendez appeals from the 140-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine and cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) and *648 846. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. Appellant contends that the district court improperly considered the Sentencing Guidelines range to be the presumptive sentence. This contention is belied by the record. Appellant also contends that the district court failed to adequately consider the nature of his criminal history under 18 U.S.C. § 8553 (a). We conclude that the district court properly considered his criminal history and the § 3553(a) factors. See United States v. Knows His Gun, 438 F.3d 913, 918-19 (9th Cir.2006), cert, denied-U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 2913 , 165 L.Ed.2d 931 (2006). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Guillermo Mendez-Mendez appeals from the 140-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine and cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Guillermo Mendez-Mendez appeals from the 140-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine and cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
02Appellant contends that the district court improperly considered the Sentencing Guidelines range to be the presumptive sentence.
03Appellant also contends that the district court failed to adequately consider the nature of his criminal history under 18 U.S.C.
04We conclude that the district court properly considered his criminal history and the § 3553(a) factors.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Guillermo Mendez-Mendez appeals from the 140-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine and cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Mendez-Mendez in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on October 1, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8644273 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.