Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8626123
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. McKay
No. 8626123 · Decided November 14, 2006
No. 8626123·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
November 14, 2006
Citation
No. 8626123
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Murray D. McKay appeals from the district court’s order revoking his supervised release and imposing 24 months imprison *762 ment on Count 1 and 12 months imprisonment on Count 3 to run consecutively, followed by 12 months of supervised release. McKay was originally convicted of two counts of burglary, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1153 and Mont.Code Ann. § 45-6-204. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for McKay has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. McKay has not filed a pro se supplemental brief, and the government has not filed an answering brief. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. Accordingly, we GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw, and AFFIRM the district court’s judgment. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
McKay appeals from the district court’s order revoking his supervised release and imposing 24 months imprison *762 ment on Count 1 and 12 months imprisonment on Count 3 to run consecutively, followed by 12 months of supervised release.
Key Points
01McKay appeals from the district court’s order revoking his supervised release and imposing 24 months imprison *762 ment on Count 1 and 12 months imprisonment on Count 3 to run consecutively, followed by 12 months of supervised release.
02McKay was originally convicted of two counts of burglary, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
031396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for McKay has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.
04McKay has not filed a pro se supplemental brief, and the government has not filed an answering brief.
Frequently Asked Questions
McKay appeals from the district court’s order revoking his supervised release and imposing 24 months imprison *762 ment on Count 1 and 12 months imprisonment on Count 3 to run consecutively, followed by 12 months of supervised release.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. McKay in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on November 14, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8626123 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.