Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8624379
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. McBride
No. 8624379 · Decided August 24, 2006
No. 8624379·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 24, 2006
Citation
No. 8624379
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Mitchell D. McBride appeals from the 30-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for 51 counts of mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. McBride contends that the district court abused its discretion by applying an enhancement for the amount of loss based on the facts contained in the Presentence Report. Because McBride challenged the legal basis for the enhancement in the district court, but never disputed the accuracy of the factual basis for the enhancement, we conclude that the district court properly determined that the government met its burden of proof to support the enhancement for amount of loss. See United States v. Charlesworth, 217 F.3d 1155, 1160-61 (9th Cir.2000). McBride also contends that the district court abused its discretion applying an enhancement for vulnerable victims. We conclude that the record supports the district court’s finding that McBride targeted vulnerable victims. See United States v. Williams, 441 F.3d 716, 725-26 (9th Cir. 2006). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
McBride appeals from the 30-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for 51 counts of mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
Key Points
01McBride appeals from the 30-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for 51 counts of mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
02McBride contends that the district court abused its discretion by applying an enhancement for the amount of loss based on the facts contained in the Presentence Report.
03Because McBride challenged the legal basis for the enhancement in the district court, but never disputed the accuracy of the factual basis for the enhancement, we conclude that the district court properly determined that the government met
04McBride also contends that the district court abused its discretion applying an enhancement for vulnerable victims.
Frequently Asked Questions
McBride appeals from the 30-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for 51 counts of mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. McBride in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 24, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8624379 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.