Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8621529
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Martin
No. 8621529 · Decided May 22, 2006
No. 8621529·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
May 22, 2006
Citation
No. 8621529
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Susan Martin appeals the restitution order imposed following her guilty plea conviction for wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 , forging endorsements on Treasury Checks or Bonds, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 510 , and attempting to evade of defeat tax, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 510 . Martin contends that the district court violated her Sixth Amendment rights in ordering restitution because the assignment of the restitution amount far exceeded what she admitted to or which was proven beyond a reasonable doubt at the change of plea hearing. This contention is foreclosed by United States v. Bussell, 414 F.3d 1048, 1060 (9th Cir.2005) (holding that district court orders of restitution are unaffected by United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 , 125 S.Ct. 738 , 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005)). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Susan Martin appeals the restitution order imposed following her guilty plea conviction for wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Susan Martin appeals the restitution order imposed following her guilty plea conviction for wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
02§ 1343 , forging endorsements on Treasury Checks or Bonds, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
03§ 510 , and attempting to evade of defeat tax, in violation of 26 U.S.C.
04Martin contends that the district court violated her Sixth Amendment rights in ordering restitution because the assignment of the restitution amount far exceeded what she admitted to or which was proven beyond a reasonable doubt at the chan
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Susan Martin appeals the restitution order imposed following her guilty plea conviction for wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Martin in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 22, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8621529 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.