Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8661328
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Marshall
No. 8661328 · Decided April 16, 2008
No. 8661328·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
April 16, 2008
Citation
No. 8661328
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM * Wayne Jason Marshall pleaded guilty to one count of bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a). At sentencing, the district court found that Marshall qualified as a “career offender” under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1, and sentenced him to 120 months’ imprisonment. Marshall appeals his sentence contending that he does not qualify as a career offender because the district court erred in finding that his prior conviction under California Vehicle Code § 2800.2 (“§ 2800.2”) was a “crime of violence” under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a). We agree. We hold that Marshall’s conviction under § 2800.2, for flight from a pursuing police officer in willful or wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property, is not categorically a crime of violence. See United States v. Jennings, 515 F.3d 980, 989-91 (9th Cir.2008); United States v. Kelly, 422 F.3d 889, 895 (9th Cir.2005) (holding that a Washington state conviction for attempting to elude a pursuing police officer was not a crime of violence because the statute criminalized conduct that did not “present[ ] a serious potential risk of physical injury to another,” as required by U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a)(2)). Under the modified categorical approach, we also hold that Marshall’s § 2800.2 conviction is not a crime of violence. Marshall’s statement in his plea agreement that he was “driving recklessly” is insufficient to establish that he was convicted of a crime of violence. See Kelly, 422 F.3d at 896 . Because Marshall’s prior conviction under § 2800.2 does not, under our court’s case law, constitute a crime of violence, the district court erred in sentencing him as a *684 career offender. We therefore vacate Marshall’s sentence and remand for resentencing. VACATE and REMAND. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM * Wayne Jason Marshall pleaded guilty to one count of bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM * Wayne Jason Marshall pleaded guilty to one count of bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
02At sentencing, the district court found that Marshall qualified as a “career offender” under U.S.S.G.
03Marshall appeals his sentence contending that he does not qualify as a career offender because the district court erred in finding that his prior conviction under California Vehicle Code § 2800.2 (“§ 2800.2”) was a “crime of violence” under
04We hold that Marshall’s conviction under § 2800.2, for flight from a pursuing police officer in willful or wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property, is not categorically a crime of violence.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM * Wayne Jason Marshall pleaded guilty to one count of bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Marshall in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 16, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8661328 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.