Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10314250
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Markanthony Sapalasan
No. 10314250 · Decided January 15, 2025
No. 10314250·Ninth Circuit · 2025·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
January 15, 2025
Citation
No. 10314250
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30251
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No.
3:18-cr-00130-
v. TMB-MMS-1
MARKANTHONY DELEON ORDER
SAPALASAN,
Defendant-Appellant.
Filed January 15, 2025
Before: Michael Daly Hawkins, Ryan D. Nelson, and
Daniel P. Collins, Circuit Judges.
Order
2 USA V. SAPALASAN
ORDER
The panel unanimously voted to deny the petition for
panel rehearing. Judge R. Nelson and Judge Collins voted
to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Hawkins
recommended denying the petition for rehearing en banc. A
judge of the court requested a vote on whether to rehear the
matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of
the votes of the active judges in favor of en banc
consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for panel
rehearing and rehearing en banc, Dkt. 49, is DENIED.
Plain English Summary
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No.
Key Points
01FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No.
02TMB-MMS-1 MARKANTHONY DELEON ORDER SAPALASAN, Defendant-Appellant.
03Filed January 15, 2025 Before: Michael Daly Hawkins, Ryan D.
04SAPALASAN ORDER The panel unanimously voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing.
Frequently Asked Questions
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Markanthony Sapalasan in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on January 15, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10314250 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.