Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8693832
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Majidi
No. 8693832 · Decided March 16, 2015
No. 8693832·Ninth Circuit · 2015·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
March 16, 2015
Citation
No. 8693832
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** In these consolidated appeals, Mohammad Majidi appeals from the district court’s judgments and challenges the 18-month concurrent sentences imposed upon revocation of supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Majidi’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Majidi has filed pro se supplemental briefs, and the government has filed an answering brief. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. Majidi’s motion for appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** In these consolidated appeals, Mohammad Majidi appeals from the district court’s judgments and challenges the 18-month concurrent sentences imposed upon revocation of supervised release.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** In these consolidated appeals, Mohammad Majidi appeals from the district court’s judgments and challenges the 18-month concurrent sentences imposed upon revocation of supervised release.
021396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Majidi’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.
03Majidi has filed pro se supplemental briefs, and the government has filed an answering brief.
04346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** In these consolidated appeals, Mohammad Majidi appeals from the district court’s judgments and challenges the 18-month concurrent sentences imposed upon revocation of supervised release.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Majidi in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 16, 2015.
Use the citation No. 8693832 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.