FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8641884
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. Lewis

No. 8641884 · Decided July 11, 2007
No. 8641884 · Ninth Circuit · 2007 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
July 11, 2007
Citation
No. 8641884
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** James Paul Lewis, Jr. appeals his sentence following his convictions for mail fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1341 , and money laundering, id. § 1957. Because the facts are known to the parties, we do not review them here. The district court sentenced Lewis to thirty years on the mail fraud count and ten years on the money laundering count, with the terms to run concurrently. As the government concedes, Lewis’s thirty-year sentence on the mail fraud count exceeds the statutory maximum for that count. See 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (providing for a maximum of twenty years unless the fraud “affects a financial institution,” a circumstance not alleged in this case). The sentence’s illegality requires a remand for resentencing. 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (f)(1); United States v. Joetzki, 952 F.2d 1090, 1097-98 (9th Cir.1991). Because Lewis’s sentence must be vacated on this ground, we do not reach Lewis’s other claims of error. On resentencing, the district court shall consider all the sentencing factors contained in 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a). If the district court chooses to impose a sentence in excess of the applicable Guidelines range, then it must set forth enough of its reasoning “to satisfy the appellate court that [the district court] has considered the parties’ arguments and has a reasoned basis for exercising [its] own legal decisionmaking authority.” Rita v. United States, — U.S. -, -, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 2468-69 , 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007). The sentence is VACATED and the case REMANDED for resentencing. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
appeals his sentence following his convictions for mail fraud, 18 U.S.C.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
appeals his sentence following his convictions for mail fraud, 18 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Lewis in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 11, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8641884 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →