Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8648251
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Lamere
No. 8648251 · Decided March 10, 2008
No. 8648251·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
March 10, 2008
Citation
No. 8648251
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Rick L. Lamere appeals from the 320-month sentence imposed by the district court in an amended judgment following its grant of a downward departure pursuant to the government’s Rule 35 motion. Because Lamere is appealing the district court’s ruling on a Rule 35 motion, this Court may assert jurisdiction only if his appeal satisfies one of the four criteria enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (a). See United States v. Arishi, 54 F.3d 596, 599 (9th Cir.1995). Lamere’s only contention is that the sentence reduction he received does not properly reflect the assistance he provided to the government. Because he has failed to satisfy the requirements set forth in § 3742(a), we lack jurisdiction to review this appeal. See Arishi, 54 F.3d at 597 ; cf. United States v. Doe, 374 F.3d 851, 853 (9th Cir.2004). DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
Lamere appeals from the 320-month sentence imposed by the district court in an amended judgment following its grant of a downward departure pursuant to the government’s Rule 35 motion.
Key Points
01Lamere appeals from the 320-month sentence imposed by the district court in an amended judgment following its grant of a downward departure pursuant to the government’s Rule 35 motion.
02Because Lamere is appealing the district court’s ruling on a Rule 35 motion, this Court may assert jurisdiction only if his appeal satisfies one of the four criteria enumerated in 18 U.S.C.
03Lamere’s only contention is that the sentence reduction he received does not properly reflect the assistance he provided to the government.
04Because he has failed to satisfy the requirements set forth in § 3742(a), we lack jurisdiction to review this appeal.
Frequently Asked Questions
Lamere appeals from the 320-month sentence imposed by the district court in an amended judgment following its grant of a downward departure pursuant to the government’s Rule 35 motion.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Lamere in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 10, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8648251 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.