Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8641689
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Jimenez-Ortega
No. 8641689 · Decided June 15, 2007
No. 8641689·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
June 15, 2007
Citation
No. 8641689
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Armando Jimenez-Ortega appeals from his conviction and 46-month sentence following his guilty plea to illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), appellant’s counsel has filed a brief which states that there are no grounds for relief, and which contains a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Appellant did not file a pro se supplemental brief, and the Government did not file an answering brief. We have reviewed the brief and conducted an independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), and we dismiss the appeal in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000) (appeal waiver valid when entered into knowingly and voluntarily). Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Armando Jimenez-Ortega appeals from his conviction and 46-month sentence following his guilty plea to illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Armando Jimenez-Ortega appeals from his conviction and 46-month sentence following his guilty plea to illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C.
021396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), appellant’s counsel has filed a brief which states that there are no grounds for relief, and which contains a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.
03Appellant did not file a pro se supplemental brief, and the Government did not file an answering brief.
04We have reviewed the brief and conducted an independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Armando Jimenez-Ortega appeals from his conviction and 46-month sentence following his guilty plea to illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Jimenez-Ortega in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on June 15, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8641689 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.