Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8623535
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Jefferson
No. 8623535 · Decided July 28, 2006
No. 8623535·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
July 28, 2006
Citation
No. 8623535
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Peter John Jefferson appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed after the revocation of his term of supervised release. This court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 8742 . Jefferson argues the district court failed to consider the factors enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a), as incorporated by 18 U.S.C. § 3583 . However, the district court found Jefferson failed more than once to meet the conditions of his supervised release and was a danger to his community. This explanation shows that the district court took the § 3553(a) factors adequately into account in fashioning a sentence. See United States v. Musa, 220 F.3d 1096, 1101 (9th Cir.2000) (holding district court’s finding that defendant was a danger to the community was sufficient explanation for application of statutory maximum term of incarceration after revocation of supervised release). Having considered various factors before imposing a sentence at the statutory maximum, the district court fashioned a reasonable sentence. See id. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Peter John Jefferson appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed after the revocation of his term of supervised release.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Peter John Jefferson appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed after the revocation of his term of supervised release.
02Jefferson argues the district court failed to consider the factors enumerated in 18 U.S.C.
03However, the district court found Jefferson failed more than once to meet the conditions of his supervised release and was a danger to his community.
04This explanation shows that the district court took the § 3553(a) factors adequately into account in fashioning a sentence.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Peter John Jefferson appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed after the revocation of his term of supervised release.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Jefferson in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 28, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8623535 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.