FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 7221700
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. Jango

No. 7221700 · Decided March 19, 2002
No. 7221700 · Ninth Circuit · 2002 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
March 19, 2002
Citation
No. 7221700
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM * Victor Jango appeals the 24-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for conspiracy and money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 871 and 1956(h), respectively. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . Jango’s appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating that there are no arguable issues for review. 1 Jango has filed a pro se supplemental brief, in which he contends that he was denied the right of allocution at sentencing. Our review of the record, however, reveals that Jango did have the opportunity to personally address the court, and therefore, no error resulted. Having conducted an independent review of the record as required by Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82-83 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we conclude that there are no arguable issues for review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. . Pursuant to a signed plea agreement, Jango waived his right to appeal any sentence imposed within the statutory maximum and where the district court determined the total offense level at 17 or below. Because the district court failed to comply with Fed. R. Crim P. Rule 11(c)(6) and informed Jango at the change of plea that he had the right to appeal the application of the guidelines, we determine that we retain jurisdiction to review Jango’s claim on appeal. See United States v. Buchanan, 59 F.3d 914, 917-18 (9th Cir. 1995) ("Given the district court judge’s clear statements at sentencing, the defendant’s assertion of understanding, and the prosecution’s failure to object, we hold that in these circumstances, the district court’s oral pronouncement controls and the plea agreement waiver is not enforceable.”).
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM * Victor Jango appeals the 24-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for conspiracy and money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM * Victor Jango appeals the 24-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for conspiracy and money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Jango in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 19, 2002.
Use the citation No. 7221700 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →