FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 313668
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. James William Epperson, United States of America v. Harold Gene Easley, United States of America v. Donald D. Warren, AKA Robert Cox, United States of America v. Harold Don Claborn

No. 313668 · Decided September 21, 1973
No. 313668 · Ninth Circuit · 1973 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
September 21, 1973
Citation
No. 313668
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Plain English Summary
Plain-English summary coming soon. Read the opinion text below for the current holding.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
United States v. James William Epperson, United States of America v. Harold Gene Easley, United States of America v. Donald D. Warren, AKA Robert Cox, United States of America v. Harold Don Claborn is a decision of the Ninth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. James William Epperson, United States of America v. Harold Gene Easley, United States of America v. Donald D. Warren, AKA Robert Cox, United States of America v. Harold Don Claborn in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 21, 1973.
Use the citation No. 313668 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →