United States v. Ibarra-Ozuna

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 21 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-3913 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:18-cr-00076-DLR-1 v. MEMORANDUM* MARTIN IBARRA-OZUNA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Douglas L. Rayes, District Judge, Presiding Submitted March 17, 2025** Before: CANBY, R. NELSON, and FORREST, Circuit Judges. Martin Ibarra-Ozuna appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the supervised release conditions imposed on remand for resentencing. Ibarra-Ozuna’s counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating that there are no non-frivolous arguments for appeal. Appellant * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). has not filed a pro se supplemental brief. Our independent review of the record, see Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no non-frivolous arguments to be made on direct appeal. In light of counsel’s intention to file a petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court on behalf of Ibarra-Ozuna, counsel’s motion to withdraw is denied. AFFIRMED. 2 24-3913