Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8622687
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Hughes
No. 8622687 · Decided June 28, 2006
No. 8622687·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
June 28, 2006
Citation
No. 8622687
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM * Thomas S. Hughes appeals his sentence, imposed following his guilty plea to three counts of securities fraud and one count of criminal contempt. The sentencing preceded the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 , 125 S.Ct. 738 , 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). The sentence was thus imposed at a time when the district court understandably believed the Sentencing Guidelines to be mandatory. Booker held otherwise, though. See United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). Since the sentence was based upon facts found by the judge rather than by a jury, and since the original sentencing judge is no longer available, due to Judge Manella’s resignation from the district court, the sentence must be vacated and the case remanded for a full resentencing hearing. See United States v. Sanders, 421 F.3d 1044, 1052 (9th Cir.2005). SENTENCE VACATED AND REMANDED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
Hughes appeals his sentence, imposed following his guilty plea to three counts of securities fraud and one count of criminal contempt.
Key Points
01Hughes appeals his sentence, imposed following his guilty plea to three counts of securities fraud and one count of criminal contempt.
02The sentencing preceded the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v.
03The sentence was thus imposed at a time when the district court understandably believed the Sentencing Guidelines to be mandatory.
04Since the sentence was based upon facts found by the judge rather than by a jury, and since the original sentencing judge is no longer available, due to Judge Manella’s resignation from the district court, the sentence must be vacated and t
Frequently Asked Questions
Hughes appeals his sentence, imposed following his guilty plea to three counts of securities fraud and one count of criminal contempt.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Hughes in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on June 28, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8622687 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.