Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8692338
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Huffine
No. 8692338 · Decided April 20, 2010
No. 8692338·Ninth Circuit · 2010·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
April 20, 2010
Citation
No. 8692338
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Eldon Lewis Huffine appeals from the five-month sentence imposed upon revocation of his supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Huf-fine’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. By order filed February 4, 2010, counsel was advised that the court appeared to lack jurisdiction over the appeal because appellant has completed his federal sentence without an additional term of supervised release, and has paid his restitution, fine, and special assessment. Counsel was ordered to move for voluntary dismissal or show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed. To date, counsel has not responded. Because Huffine has completed his federal sentence, we dismiss the appeal as moot. See United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir.1999). Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Eldon Lewis Huffine appeals from the five-month sentence imposed upon revocation of his supervised release.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Eldon Lewis Huffine appeals from the five-month sentence imposed upon revocation of his supervised release.
021396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Huf-fine’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.
03By order filed February 4, 2010, counsel was advised that the court appeared to lack jurisdiction over the appeal because appellant has completed his federal sentence without an additional term of supervised release, and has paid his restit
04Counsel was ordered to move for voluntary dismissal or show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Eldon Lewis Huffine appeals from the five-month sentence imposed upon revocation of his supervised release.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Huffine in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 20, 2010.
Use the citation No. 8692338 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.