United States v. Holsey

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 10 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 25-564 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 4:22-cr-02030-JCH-JR-1 v. MEMORANDUM* DIJON CAURON HOLSEY, AKA Dijon Holsey, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona John C. Hinderaker, District Judge, Presiding Submitted August 19, 2025** Before: SILVERMAN, HURWITZ, and BADE, Circuit Judges. Dijon Cauron Holsey appeals from the revocation of supervised release and the imposition of a 6-month sentence to be followed by 24 months of supervised release. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).  Holsey’s counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating that there are no non-frivolous arguments for appeal. Holsey has not filed a pro se supplemental brief. Our independent review of the record, see Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no non-frivolous arguments to be made on direct appeal. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. AFFIRMED. 2 25-564