Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8689554
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Guillen-Favela
No. 8689554 · Decided September 30, 2008
No. 8689554·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
September 30, 2008
Citation
No. 8689554
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Dario Guillen-Favela appeals from the 80-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we vacate and remand. Guillen-Favela contends that the district court erred by applying a 16-level enhancement for a previous drug trafficking offense under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A) because the record did not establish that his previous conviction necessarily qualified as a drug trafficking offense. We conclude that the record does not clearly and unequivocally establish that Guillen-Favela was previously convicted of a drug trafficking offense, and that the enhancement was therefore improper. See Malta-Espinoza v. Gonzales, 478 F.3d 1080, 1082-1084 (9th Cir.2007); see also United States v. Kovac, 367 F.3d 1116, 1119 (9th Cir.2004). VACATED and REMANDED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Dario Guillen-Favela appeals from the 80-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Dario Guillen-Favela appeals from the 80-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
02Guillen-Favela contends that the district court erred by applying a 16-level enhancement for a previous drug trafficking offense under U.S.S.G.
03§ 2L1.2(b)(l)(A) because the record did not establish that his previous conviction necessarily qualified as a drug trafficking offense.
04We conclude that the record does not clearly and unequivocally establish that Guillen-Favela was previously convicted of a drug trafficking offense, and that the enhancement was therefore improper.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Dario Guillen-Favela appeals from the 80-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Guillen-Favela in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 30, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8689554 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.