Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8647130
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Gonzalez-Mendoza
No. 8647130 · Decided January 18, 2008
No. 8647130·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
January 18, 2008
Citation
No. 8647130
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Celestino Gonzalez-Mendoza appeals from the district court’s order finding that Gonzalez-Mendoza should not receive a different sentence under the advisory Guidelines. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Gonzalez-Mendoza’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s order is AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Celestino Gonzalez-Mendoza appeals from the district court’s order finding that Gonzalez-Mendoza should not receive a different sentence under the advisory Guidelines.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Celestino Gonzalez-Mendoza appeals from the district court’s order finding that Gonzalez-Mendoza should not receive a different sentence under the advisory Guidelines.
021396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Gonzalez-Mendoza’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.
03346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal.
04Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s order is AFFIRMED.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Celestino Gonzalez-Mendoza appeals from the district court’s order finding that Gonzalez-Mendoza should not receive a different sentence under the advisory Guidelines.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Gonzalez-Mendoza in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on January 18, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8647130 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.