Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8691289
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Gonzalez
No. 8691289 · Decided November 6, 2008
No. 8691289·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
November 6, 2008
Citation
No. 8691289
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Luis Enrique Gonzalez appeals from the district court’s determination, upon remand, that there was not a complete breakdown in communication between Gonzalez and trial counsel which prevented the presentation of an adequate defense at trial. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Gonzalez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s determination is AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Luis Enrique Gonzalez appeals from the district court’s determination, upon remand, that there was not a complete breakdown in communication between Gonzalez and trial counsel which prevented the presentation of an adequate de
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Luis Enrique Gonzalez appeals from the district court’s determination, upon remand, that there was not a complete breakdown in communication between Gonzalez and trial counsel which prevented the presentation of an adequate de
021396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Gonzalez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.
03We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief.
04No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Luis Enrique Gonzalez appeals from the district court’s determination, upon remand, that there was not a complete breakdown in communication between Gonzalez and trial counsel which prevented the presentation of an adequate de
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Gonzalez in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on November 6, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8691289 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.