Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8627182
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Garza
No. 8627182 · Decided December 27, 2006
No. 8627182·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 27, 2006
Citation
No. 8627182
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Gerónimo Garza, Jr. appeals from his jury-trial conviction and 15-month sentence imposed for making false statements to the Farm Service Agency of the United States Department of Agriculture, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 , 1001, and 1014. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Garza has filed a brief stating that she finds no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Our examination of the brief and our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82-83 , 109 S. Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no grounds for relief on direct appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Appellant’s motion for decision is DENIED as moot. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
appeals from his jury-trial conviction and 15-month sentence imposed for making false statements to the Farm Service Agency of the United States Department of Agriculture, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
Key Points
01appeals from his jury-trial conviction and 15-month sentence imposed for making false statements to the Farm Service Agency of the United States Department of Agriculture, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
021396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Garza has filed a brief stating that she finds no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.
03No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
04Our examination of the brief and our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v.
Frequently Asked Questions
appeals from his jury-trial conviction and 15-month sentence imposed for making false statements to the Farm Service Agency of the United States Department of Agriculture, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Garza in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 27, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8627182 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.