Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8648235
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Garcia-Flores
No. 8648235 · Decided March 10, 2008
No. 8648235·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
March 10, 2008
Citation
No. 8648235
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Jose Garcia-Flores appeals from the 77-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. Garcia-Flores contends that the district court erred by refusing to consider at sentencing the fact that he had rejected a fast-track plea agreement with a 51-month sentence. He further contends that, as a result, the district court was unable to consider whether there was an unwarranted disparity between his sentence and those imposed on similarly-situated defendants in the same federal district who accepted fast-track plea agreements. We conclude that the district court did not commit procedural error and that Garcia-Flores’ sentence is reasonable. See Gall v. United States, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 586, 598-600 , 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); see also United States v. Marcial-Santiago, 447 F.3d 715, 718-19 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 309 , 166 L.Ed.2d 232 (2006). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Jose Garcia-Flores appeals from the 77-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Jose Garcia-Flores appeals from the 77-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
02Garcia-Flores contends that the district court erred by refusing to consider at sentencing the fact that he had rejected a fast-track plea agreement with a 51-month sentence.
03He further contends that, as a result, the district court was unable to consider whether there was an unwarranted disparity between his sentence and those imposed on similarly-situated defendants in the same federal district who accepted fa
04We conclude that the district court did not commit procedural error and that Garcia-Flores’ sentence is reasonable.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Jose Garcia-Flores appeals from the 77-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Garcia-Flores in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 10, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8648235 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.