Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8626914
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Flores-Sandoval
No. 8626914 · Decided December 12, 2006
No. 8626914·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 12, 2006
Citation
No. 8626914
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Rafael Flores-Sandoval appeals from the 33-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 . Because a review of the record indicates that Flores-Sandoval knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal and was sentenced within the terms of the plea agreement, we enforce the waiver and dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000) (stating that an appeal waiver is valid when it is entered into knowingly and voluntarily); see also United States v. Cardenas, 405 F.3d 1046, 1048 (9th Cir.2005) (noting that changes in sentencing law imposed by United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 , 125 S.Ct. 738 , 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), did not render waiver of appeal involuntary and unknowing). DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Rafael Flores-Sandoval appeals from the 33-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Rafael Flores-Sandoval appeals from the 33-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
02Because a review of the record indicates that Flores-Sandoval knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal and was sentenced within the terms of the plea agreement, we enforce the waiver and dismiss the appeal.
03Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000) (stating that an appeal waiver is valid when it is entered into knowingly and voluntarily); see also United States v.
04Cardenas, 405 F.3d 1046, 1048 (9th Cir.2005) (noting that changes in sentencing law imposed by United States v.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Rafael Flores-Sandoval appeals from the 33-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Flores-Sandoval in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 12, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8626914 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.