Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8627172
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Fisher
No. 8627172 · Decided December 19, 2006
No. 8627172·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 19, 2006
Citation
No. 8627172
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Darryl Fisher pled guilty to possession of an unregistered firearm and was convicted. He appeals, challenging the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress a shotgun seized during a search of his mother’s car. The district court did not err in denying Fisher’s motion to suppress. “The proponent of a motion to suppress has the burden of establishing that his own Fourth Amendment rights were violated by the challenged search or seizure.” Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128 , 131 n. 1, 99 S.Ct. 421 , 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978); see also United States v. Singleton, 987 F.2d 1444, 1449 (9th Cir.1993). By disclaiming ownership and access to the car, Fisher voluntarily abandoned the vehicle and lost his right to protest its search and the seizure therein. See United States v. Nordling, 804 F.2d 1466, 1469 (9th Cir.1986); United States v. Huffhines, 967 F.2d 314, 318 (9th Cir.1992). Even if Fisher’s denial of ownership and statements that he had no key to the car were insufficient to constitute “abandonment,” the district court properly admitted the evidence under the automobile exception to the warrant requirement. “If a car is readily mobile and probable cause exists to believe it contains contraband, the Fourth Amendment thus permits police to search the vehicle without more.” Pennsylvania v. Labran, 518 U.S. 938, 940 , 116 S.Ct. 2485 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1031 (1996). “Probable cause to search exists when the known facts and circumstances are sufficient to warrant a reasonable person to conclude that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found.” United States v. Ibarra, 345 F.3d 711, 716 (9th Cir.2003). In this case, a reasonable person could conclude that a search of the car would reveal an illegal firearm, based upon Fisher’s conflicting stories and deceptive responses to the police officer. The district court’s judgment is hereby AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Darryl Fisher pled guilty to possession of an unregistered firearm and was convicted.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Darryl Fisher pled guilty to possession of an unregistered firearm and was convicted.
02He appeals, challenging the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress a shotgun seized during a search of his mother’s car.
03The district court did not err in denying Fisher’s motion to suppress.
04“The proponent of a motion to suppress has the burden of establishing that his own Fourth Amendment rights were violated by the challenged search or seizure.” Rakas v.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Darryl Fisher pled guilty to possession of an unregistered firearm and was convicted.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Fisher in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 19, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8627172 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.