Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8695996
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Farias
No. 8695996 · Decided March 21, 2016
No. 8695996·Ninth Circuit · 2016·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
March 21, 2016
Citation
No. 8695996
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Jesus Carlos Farias appeals from the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 *465 (1967), Farias’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Fari-as the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Jesus Carlos Farias appeals from the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Jesus Carlos Farias appeals from the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.
021396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 *465 (1967), Farias’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.
03We have provided Fari-as the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief.
04No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Jesus Carlos Farias appeals from the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Farias in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 21, 2016.
Use the citation No. 8695996 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.