Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8689370
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Eslava-Ordinola
No. 8689370 · Decided September 23, 2008
No. 8689370·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
September 23, 2008
Citation
No. 8689370
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Miguel Eslava-Ordinola appeals from the 51-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Eslava-Ordinola’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no arguable grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. We have conducted an independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988). We dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir. 2000). Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Miguel Eslava-Ordinola appeals from the 51-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Miguel Eslava-Ordinola appeals from the 51-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
021396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Eslava-Ordinola’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no arguable grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.
03We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief.
04No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Miguel Eslava-Ordinola appeals from the 51-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Eslava-Ordinola in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 23, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8689370 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.