Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8623175
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Eriksen
No. 8623175 · Decided July 26, 2006
No. 8623175·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
July 26, 2006
Citation
No. 8623175
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Luis Carlos Eriksen appeals from the judgment of conviction and 180-month sentence imposed following his jury trial for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana and possession with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1), (b)(l)(B)(vii), and 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Eriksen has filed a brief stating that he finds no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Our examination of the brief and our independent review of the record on appeal pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no grounds for relief on direct appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Luis Carlos Eriksen appeals from the judgment of conviction and 180-month sentence imposed following his jury trial for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana and possession with intent to distribute marijua
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Luis Carlos Eriksen appeals from the judgment of conviction and 180-month sentence imposed following his jury trial for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana and possession with intent to distribute marijua
021396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Eriksen has filed a brief stating that he finds no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.
03No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
04Our examination of the brief and our independent review of the record on appeal pursuant to Penson v.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Luis Carlos Eriksen appeals from the judgment of conviction and 180-month sentence imposed following his jury trial for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana and possession with intent to distribute marijua
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Eriksen in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 26, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8623175 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.