Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8690207
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Duran-Estrada
No. 8690207 · Decided October 21, 2008
No. 8690207·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
October 21, 2008
Citation
No. 8690207
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Francisco Duran-Estrada appeals from the 40-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 , and being an illegal alien in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(5). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. Duran-Estrada contends that the district court committed procedural error by failing to adequately explain his sentence and that the sentence is substantively unreasonable because it is greater than necessary in light of his personal circumstances. We conclude that the district court did not commit procedural error and that the sentence imposed is substantively reasonable. See United States v. Stoterau, 524 F.3d 988, 999-1002 (9th Cir.2008). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Francisco Duran-Estrada appeals from the 40-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Francisco Duran-Estrada appeals from the 40-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
02§ 1326 , and being an illegal alien in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
03Duran-Estrada contends that the district court committed procedural error by failing to adequately explain his sentence and that the sentence is substantively unreasonable because it is greater than necessary in light of his personal circum
04We conclude that the district court did not commit procedural error and that the sentence imposed is substantively reasonable.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Francisco Duran-Estrada appeals from the 40-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Duran-Estrada in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on October 21, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8690207 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.