Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8642424
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Drabos
No. 8642424 · Decided August 20, 2007
No. 8642424·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 20, 2007
Citation
No. 8642424
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Luis Demetrio Drabos appeals from the district court’s judgment and 41-month sentence imposed following his jury-trial conviction for conspiracy and aiding and abetting firearms offenses in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 2. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Drabos’ counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Drabos did not file a pro se supplemental brief, and the Government did not file an answering brief. Our independent review of the briefs and the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Luis Demetrio Drabos appeals from the district court’s judgment and 41-month sentence imposed following his jury-trial conviction for conspiracy and aiding and abetting firearms offenses in violation of 18 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Luis Demetrio Drabos appeals from the district court’s judgment and 41-month sentence imposed following his jury-trial conviction for conspiracy and aiding and abetting firearms offenses in violation of 18 U.S.C.
021396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Drabos’ counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.
03Drabos did not file a pro se supplemental brief, and the Government did not file an answering brief.
04Our independent review of the briefs and the record pursuant to Penson v.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Luis Demetrio Drabos appeals from the district court’s judgment and 41-month sentence imposed following his jury-trial conviction for conspiracy and aiding and abetting firearms offenses in violation of 18 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Drabos in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 20, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8642424 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.