Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8642390
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Crews
No. 8642390 · Decided August 20, 2007
No. 8642390·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 20, 2007
Citation
No. 8642390
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Chad Alan Crews appeals from the district court’s judgment and 240-month sentence imposed following his jury-trial conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) and 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Crews’ counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Crews filed a pro se supplemental brief, and the Government did not file an answering brief. Our independent review of the briefs and the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Chad Alan Crews appeals from the district court’s judgment and 240-month sentence imposed following his jury-trial conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Chad Alan Crews appeals from the district court’s judgment and 240-month sentence imposed following his jury-trial conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
021396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Crews’ counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.
03Crews filed a pro se supplemental brief, and the Government did not file an answering brief.
04Our independent review of the briefs and the record pursuant to Penson v.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Chad Alan Crews appeals from the district court’s judgment and 240-month sentence imposed following his jury-trial conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Crews in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 20, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8642390 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.