United States v. Castro-Lopez

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 27 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-6754 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 4:21-cr-03039-RCC-MSA-1 v. MEMORANDUM* JOSE LUIS GUADALUPE CASTRO- LOPEZ, AKA Jose Luis Castro- Lopez, AKA Jose Castro-Lopez, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Raner C. Collins, District Judge, Presiding Submitted June 18, 2025** Before: CANBY, S.R. THOMAS, and SUNG, Circuit Judges. Jose Luis Guadalupe Castro-Lopez appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking supervised release and imposing a 7-month custodial sentence. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).  Castro-Lopez’s counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating that there are no non-frivolous arguments for appeal. Castro- Lopez has not filed a pro se supplemental brief. Our independent review of the record, see Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no non-frivolous arguments to be made on direct appeal. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. AFFIRMED. 2 24-6754