Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 7215429
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Brown
No. 7215429 · Decided February 22, 2002
No. 7215429·Ninth Circuit · 2002·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
February 22, 2002
Citation
No. 7215429
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Cutrenia Monea Brown appeals her 24-month sentence following a guilty plea conviction for making false, fictitious or fraudulent claims against the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 287 . We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Brown contends that the district court erroneously concluded it lacked the discretion to depart downward on the combined grounds of her post-offense rehabilitation, her extraordinary family circumstances, and her cooperation with the government. Neither party disputed the court’s authority to depart, rather the issue presented to the district court was whether the facts in this case warranted a downward depar *265 ture; the court simply declined to exercise its discretion based on those facts. See United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057, 1064 (9th Cir.2000) (“Although the district court did not specifically address its authority to depart downward ... it is clear from the record that its refusal to depart downward was not based on a belief that it lacked the authority to depart downward ... but rather, was an exercise of its discretion.”). Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s discretionary denial of Brown’s request for a downward departure. See id. DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Cutrenia Monea Brown appeals her 24-month sentence following a guilty plea conviction for making false, fictitious or fraudulent claims against the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Cutrenia Monea Brown appeals her 24-month sentence following a guilty plea conviction for making false, fictitious or fraudulent claims against the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C.
02Brown contends that the district court erroneously concluded it lacked the discretion to depart downward on the combined grounds of her post-offense rehabilitation, her extraordinary family circumstances, and her cooperation with the govern
03Neither party disputed the court’s authority to depart, rather the issue presented to the district court was whether the facts in this case warranted a downward depar *265 ture; the court simply declined to exercise its discretion based on
04Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057, 1064 (9th Cir.2000) (“Although the district court did not specifically address its authority to depart downward ...
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Cutrenia Monea Brown appeals her 24-month sentence following a guilty plea conviction for making false, fictitious or fraudulent claims against the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Brown in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on February 22, 2002.
Use the citation No. 7215429 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.