Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8624780
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Bremmeyer
No. 8624780 · Decided September 11, 2006
No. 8624780·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
September 11, 2006
Citation
No. 8624780
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM *** Defendant objects to his sentence on the grounds that the district court erred in enhancing the offense points due to endangerment of defendant’s four-year-old son. The evidence that defendant allowed the boy access to the methamphetamine elements supports the court’s finding of endangerment. That finding is clearly made upon the basis of the testimony of the officer who examined the premises and meth labs to carefully consider the availability of the materials to the boy’s reach and interest. No point was made about the standard of proof during sentencing and we have no reason to believe that it would have had any bearing on the court’s decision. The judgment is AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM *** Defendant objects to his sentence on the grounds that the district court erred in enhancing the offense points due to endangerment of defendant’s four-year-old son.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM *** Defendant objects to his sentence on the grounds that the district court erred in enhancing the offense points due to endangerment of defendant’s four-year-old son.
02The evidence that defendant allowed the boy access to the methamphetamine elements supports the court’s finding of endangerment.
03That finding is clearly made upon the basis of the testimony of the officer who examined the premises and meth labs to carefully consider the availability of the materials to the boy’s reach and interest.
04No point was made about the standard of proof during sentencing and we have no reason to believe that it would have had any bearing on the court’s decision.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM *** Defendant objects to his sentence on the grounds that the district court erred in enhancing the offense points due to endangerment of defendant’s four-year-old son.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Bremmeyer in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 11, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8624780 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.