United States v. Bravo-Sosa

MEMORANDUM ** Noel Bravo-Sosa appeals from the district court’s judgment upon limited remand pursuant to United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc), concluding that his 293-month sentence would not have been materially different under the advisory Sentencing Guidelines. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. Bravo-Sosa contends that the district court failed to adequately state reasons for the sentence, and that the sentence is unreasonable under 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a). However, the district court considered the sentence upon limited remand and determined that it would not have imposed a materially different sentence under an advisory Guidelines system. We conclude that the district court understood the full scope of its discretion following United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 , 125 S.Ct. 738 , 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). See United States v. Combs, 470 F.3d 1294, 1296-97 (9th Cir.2006). Accordingly, the district court’s decision was reasonable. See id. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.