Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8622237
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Birdinground
No. 8622237 · Decided September 29, 2006
No. 8622237·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
September 29, 2006
Citation
No. 8622237
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** The district court did not solicit the views of counsel before deciding whether to re-sentence Appellant Clifford G. BirdinGround under United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1085 (9th Cir.2005). This mistake requires us to re-remand the case for compliance with Ameline. See United States v. Montgomery, — F.3d -, 2006 WL 2473448, at *5 (9th Cir. Aug. 29, 2006). REMANDED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** The district court did not solicit the views of counsel before deciding whether to re-sentence Appellant Clifford G.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** The district court did not solicit the views of counsel before deciding whether to re-sentence Appellant Clifford G.
02This mistake requires us to re-remand the case for compliance with Ameline.
03This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
04
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** The district court did not solicit the views of counsel before deciding whether to re-sentence Appellant Clifford G.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Birdinground in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 29, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8622237 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.